O
North Richland Hills
← Community
Zoningdeclining community discussion

TR26-04 Public hearing to consider amendments to Chapter 118 (Zoning), Sections 118-631 and 118-633 regarding data center facilities and additional regulations.

North Richland Hills

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (9)Opposed (1)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
12
Last 30 days
0
Importance
71

Declining — less community discussion. 0 comments in the last 30 days, 12 the 60 before.

Public comments (12)

SupportiveLuke CarnevaleJul 20, 2026

Supported the SUP requirement as a great first step, but urged the city to add mandatory distance requirements and address electromagnetic frequency (EMF) concerns.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:24:00 →
SupportiveMark VaughnJul 20, 2026

Shared industry experience supporting the SUP requirement, called for banning crypto-mining operations, limiting building heights, and requiring strict sound and water studies.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:27:14 →
SupportiveAmber MonaghanJul 20, 2026

Supported SUPs and highlighted health concerns related to infrasound and low-frequency noise from cooling fans, urging larger buffer zones.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:30:32 →
SupportiveLydia MahserjianJul 20, 2026

Spoke for Iron Horse residents supporting TR26-04, noting that a nearby 12,000 sq ft data center was permitted by right without neighbor notification.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:34:30 →
SupportiveKristina CarnevaleJul 20, 2026

Supported TR26-04 and expressed alarm over a proposed large data center project, emphasizing the need for enforceable standards like noise limits.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:36:40 →
SupportiveDeborah Josie KriegerJul 20, 2026

Thanked city staff and urged prompt commission recommendation so the city council can act quickly to close loopholes.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:39:20 →
SupportiveChristopher SkirvinJul 20, 2026

Voiced strong support for eliminating by-right privileges, citing potential noise, infrasound, and grid strain from large data centers.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:41:45 →
ConcernedLindsey EaganJul 20, 2026

Expressed disappointment that staff stopped at just an SUP rather than adopting comprehensive standards like Fort Worth's proposal, and asked to protect the animal shelter.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:45:00 →
ConcernedJohn SchleeterJul 20, 2026

HOA president who noted that property values are a major concern and nobody wants a data center next to their million-dollar home.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:48:00 →
SupportiveKarran MartinJul 20, 2026

Supported the SUP requirement, urged differentiating AI data centers from regular ones, and emphasized protecting nearby commercial businesses as well as homes.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:52:00 →
SupportiveBecky HernandezJul 20, 2026

Supported TR26-04, suggested banning crypto operations, aligning industrial noise limits with residential standards, and watching for closed-loop bacteria issues.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:54:30 →
OpposedAubrey RecchiaJul 20, 2026

Expressed concern over AI data centers, surveillance, grid capacity, water usage, and resource depletion in the city.

Planning and Zoning Commission — July 20, 2026 · 1:58:02 →